The John Fetterman Debate Video
/
If there's any proof of voter fraud, here it is. How the people of Pennsylvania voted this complete idiot into the Senate is a mystery. His only debate against a popular and intelligent opponent like Dr. Oz was a complete mess. Voter fraud is alive and well.
01:28
Braindead Fetterman: Hi. Goodnight Everybody
The 2022 Pennsylvania Senate debate between John Fetterman and Mehmet Oz has left an indelible mark on the world of political discourse. It was a painful and, in many ways, a shameful spectacle. Fetterman, who suffered a stroke at the debate’s outset, is undeniably physically impaired, which was painfully evident during the debate. His struggles to articulate simple answers and form coherent sentences were excruciating to witness. It would be unkind to delve into specifics, as it would serve no purpose but cruelty.
Fetterman’s potential for improvement remains uncertain. During the debate, he refused to commit to releasing comprehensive medical records, relying instead on a letter from a doctor who is also one of his donors. This refusal has cast doubt on his transparency and further deepened concerns about his ability to fulfill the duties of a Senator effectively.
The debate has made one thing clear: Fetterman’s continued pursuit of a Senate seat raises questions of personal, political, and ideological malpractice. A month ago, he had the opportunity to withdraw from the race, allowing the Pennsylvania Democratic Party to field an alternative candidate, such as Rep. Conor Lamb. By remaining in the race despite his evident struggles, Fetterman has left Democratic voters with a challenging decision. They must either turn a blind eye to his performance and vote for someone who may not be fit for the Senate or support his rival—or choose not to vote at all.
Encouraging Fetterman to persist in the race is an act of personal malpractice. Exposing an individual, especially someone who has suffered a severe health setback, to public scrutiny in such a manner is unjust. This debate will be remembered not for its substance but for the spectacle of a physically impaired candidate struggling to express himself. It is a disservice to both Fetterman and the voters who deserve candidates capable of robust and coherent engagement in political discourse.
Asking how Fetterman won the election appears to be taboo. Pennsylvania has a long track record of holding questionable elections and election fraud.
